Direct comparison test – Serlo

In this chapter we will study an important convergence criterion called the direct comparison test. This criterion allows us to deduce the convergence behavior of a series by comparing it to that of another series. That way we can answer questions regarding the convergence of a series by considering a simpler series. Using this criterion we can estimate upper or lower bounds of the series, until we hopefully find a proof for the convergence behavior.

The direct comparison test is also used to proof other criteria such as the quotient test and the root test, which are both useful tools to have when solving problems about the convergence of series.

Direct comparison test: majorant

Bearbeiten

There are two versions of the direct comparison test. The first one is a test for convergence and involves finding a majorant of the series:

Theorem (Direct comparison: majorant)

Let   be a series. If there exists a convergent series   with   for all   then   converges absolutely.

Note that from the inequality   it automatically follows that  , because   is greater or equal to the non negative number  .

Proof (Direct comparison: majorant)

If   converges, then the sequences of partial sums is bounded above (see Satz über beschränkte Reihen). Because   for all   also the corresponding sequence of partial sums of   has an upper bound:

 

The sequence of partial sums   is monotonically increasing since  . We have that the series is monotonic and bounded. Therefore   is convergent.

Comprehension question: Would it suffice for the majorant if there exists   so that   for all  ?

Yes. If the sequence of partial sums   is bounded above, then this is true also for  . Because of

 

also the sequence of partial sums   is bounded above. Since the finitely many summands   don't change the boundedness, the partial sums of   also have an upper bound. This means that   converges absolutely.

Hint

As we already mentioned in the introduction, we would like to find a preferably simple convergent series to use as our majorant. Often, we can use the series   as our majorant. We could also use a more general harmonic series   for  . Another good option is the convergent geometric series   for  , for example  .

Direct comparison test: minorant

Bearbeiten

The second comparison test is similar, but we use it to determine the divergence of a series, and it involves finding a minorant of that series.

Theorem (Direct comparison test: minorant)

Let   be a series with   for all  . If there exists a divergent series   with   for all  , then also the series   is divergent.

Proof (Direct comparison test: minorant)

Since   the sequence of partial sums of   is monotonic. According to our premise this series is divergent, so it must be unbounded. Because   for all   we have that   for all   and therefore also the sequence of partial sums of   is unbounded. This implies that   diverges (every unbounded sequence diverges.)

Hint

Analogue to the majorant condition it sufficies that   be true for all  , for a fixed  .

Hint

When using the minorant criterion in practice, often a good choice for the minorant is the divergent harmonic series  . But also the series   for   (for example  ) make for good minorants. Also the geometric series   with   is suited as a minorant.

Warning

When applying the direct comparison test using a minorant it is necessary that  ! If we only have that   for   as in the majorant case, then we cannot follow the divergence of   from the divergence of  . We can only say that   doesn't converge absolutely. To see this consider for example the series   and   with   and  . We have  , and the harmonic series   diverges. But we can show that   converges according to the Leibniz-Kriterium.

Examples and exercises

Bearbeiten

Direct comparison with majorant

Bearbeiten

Example (Direct comparison with majorant)

Take the series  . The corresponding sequence is  . If we factor out   in the denominator and reduce we get:

 

The series behaves like   and should therefore converge. We can prove this formally using our direct comparison test: From   we have that

 

With   we have found a majorant that converges. From our direct comparison test it follows that   also converges.

Exercise (Direct comparison with majorant)

Examine whether the series   converges.

How to get to the proof? (Direct comparison with majorant)

If one has little experience proving convergence of series, it is difficult to tell whether the series is convergent or divergent. Start by examining the fraction  . Maybe you see that the numerator is a polynomial of degree two and the denominator is a polynomial of degree three. This means that the whole fraction goes to zero with a rate of convergence  . In our series this fraction is squared. This means that   will go to zero with a convergences rate of  . Since   is convergent, also the series   should converge.

To prove this formally, we can use the direct comparison test and compare   to the majorant  . But we first need to show that this is indeed a majorant of our series. Here we need to make some clever estimates:

 

To estimate an upper bound we followed a schema: We removed summands that make the term smaller. For the remaining summands, that we could not simply remove, we found an estimate so that we could merge them. The end result:

 

Thus   is indeed a majorant, and since the series is convergent, by direct comparison we find that also   must be convergent.

Solution (Direct comparison with majorant)

We have that:

 

and therefore

 

is a convergent majorant of the series  . By direct comparison the series is convergent.

Direct comparison with minorant

Bearbeiten
An example for the direct comparison test (Youtube video by the Youtube channel Maths CA).

Example (Direct comparison with minorant)

Let us examine the series  . It should grow similar to  . Since the harmonic series   diverges, also the series   should diverges, and thus also our original series. Formal proof:

We have

 

Thus   is a minorant and diverges. From direct comparison it follows that   is also divergent.


Exercise (Direct comparison with minorant)

Examine whether the series   converges or diverges.

How to get to the proof? (Direct comparison with minorant)

Here it is interesting to note the rate at which the summands converge to zero. The product   converges like   towards infinity. Thus   converges to 0 like  . Since we take the square root we can see that the rate of convergence of   is like  . But the harmonic series   is divergent. This tells us that   should also diverge.

Now that we have conjectured the divergence of the series we need to prove it. We do that by direct comparison with a minorant. First we need to estimate lower bounds:

 

As in the previous exercise when we needed to estimate an upper bound, we can follow a schema: Summands that make the term bigger, can be removed. For the remaining summands we try to find an estimate so that we can merge them. So now we have a divergent minorant:  . By direct comparison it follows that   is divergent.

Proof (Direct comparison with minorant)

We have

 

The series   is divergent. Thus also   must diverge by direct comparison.

Corollary: Limit comparison test

Bearbeiten

For series with positive summands there is another test called the limit comparison test, which we can derive form the direct comparison test:

Theorem (Limit comparison test)

Let   and   be series with positive summands, and   with  , then the series   converges if and only if   converges.

Proof (Limit comparison test)

Because   there exists  , so that   for all  . This follows from the epsilon definition of convergence with  . For all   we have:

 

If   converges, then also   converges by direct comparison because of the inequality   for all  . We also see that  . But then also   converges, because multiplying by a constant factor doesn't affect convergence behaviour.

On the other side assume that   is convergent, then also   is convergent (again multiplication by a constant factor). Because of the inequality   for all   the series   is convergent by direct comparison.

Comprehension question: What can we deduce from   under the same conditions?

From the convergence of   we can deduce the convergence of  . If  , there exists   with   for all  . Thus if   is convergent it follows from direct comparison that   is convergent.

The opposite is not true: If   converges we cannot conclude that   is also convergent. As a counterexample consider   and   . Here we have

 

But   is convergent and   is divergent .

Example (Prove convergence using limit comparison test)

Consider the series  . We have

 

With   it follows that

 

Since   is convergent, is follows from the limit comparison test that   is also convergent .

Hint

As this example shows, the limit comparison test is a convenient way to prove the convergence of a series. Often, computing the limit   is easier than finding a suiting majorant. In many lectures however the limit comparison test is not discussed, so you are probably not allowed to use it either. Even so you can still use the argumentation of the proof to find the necessary majorant:

For   and   we find that  . There must exist   with   for all  . This is equivalent to   for all  . This way we have found a suitable majorant. Because we know that   converges, also   must converge. Now we use the direct comparison test to show that   is convergent.

Exercise (Limit comparison test)

Examine for which   the series   converges.

Hint: Consider the general harmonic series  .

Solution (Limit comparison test)

Fall 1:  

Here   is not a null sequence:

 

Fall 2:  

Let   and  . We have

 

Because of   and from the Grenzwertsätze it follows  . According to the limit comparison test, the series   converges if and only if   converges. Thus we know it converges for   and diverges for  .

Combining both cases we find that our series is convergent for   and divergent for  .