Proving discontinuity – Serlo

Overview

Bearbeiten

Recall that whenever we want to prove the negation of a statement about some elements of a set, we need to show that there as at least one element in that set for which the statement is not true. So, in order the prove the discontinuity of a function, all you have to show is that the function has (at least) one point of discontinuity. There are several methods available for proving the existence of a point of discontinuity:

  • Sequence criterion: Show that the function doesn't fulfill the sequence criterion at one particular point
  • Considering the left- and right-sided limits: Calculate the left-sided and right-sided limits of the function at a particular point. If either one of these limits doesn't exist, or if the limits are different, then the function is discontinuous at that point.
  • Epsilon-Delta Criterion: Show that the function doesn't fulfill the epsilon-delta criterion at a particular point.

Sequence Criterion

Bearbeiten

Main article: Sequential definition of continuity

Review: Sequence Criterion

Bearbeiten

Definition (Sequence criterion of continuity for a single argument)

A function   with   is continuous at an argument  , if for all squences   with   and   there is:

 

Sketch of the proof

Bearbeiten

In order to show that a function   is discontinuous at   using the sequence criterion, we need to find one specific sequence of arguments   with   for all   which is converging to   , such that the sequence of function values   does not converge to   . So there shall be   but   . In order for   to hold, there are two cases to be distinguished:

  • The sequence of function values   diverges.
  • The sequence of function values   converges, but its limit is not  .

Therefore, a proof of discontinuity using the sequence criterion could take the following form:

Let   be a function defined by  . This function is discontinuous at   for the following reason: We take the sequence   with   and all these elements are inside the domain of definition for  . This sequence converges to

 

However, there is  . And instead, there is ...Proof that   diverges or that the limit of   exists and is different from   ...

Example exercises

Bearbeiten

Exercise (Discontinuity of the topological sine function)

Prove discontinuity of the following function:

 

How to get to the proof? (Discontinuity of the topological sine function)

Discontinuity of   means that this function has at least one argument where   is discontinuous. For each   ,   is equal to the functionn   in a sufficiently small neighbourhood of  . Since   is just a composition of continuous functions, it is continuous itself and therefore,   must be continuous for all   , as well. So we know that the discontinuity may only be situated at   .

In order to prove that   is discontinuous at   , we need to fincd a sequence of arguments   converging to   but with   . To find such a function, let us take a look at the graph of the function   :

 
Graph of the topological sine function f

In this figure, we recognize that   takes any value between   and   infinitely often in the vicinity of  . So, for instance, we may just choose   such that   is always   . This guarantees that   - and actually any other real number   between   and   in place of   would do the job. But we need to make a specific choice for   , and   is a very simple one. In addition, we will choose   to converges to zero from above.

The following figure also contains the sequence elements   beside our function  . We may clearly see that for   the sequence of function values converges to   , which is different from the function value   :

 
Graph of the topological sine function f together with the function values for our sequence of arguments, which converges to 0 from the right and always takes function value 1.

But what are the exact values of these   for which we would like to have   To answer this question, let us resolve the equation   for   :

 

So for each   with   , we have  . In order to get positive   converging to zero from above, we may for instance choose  . In that case:

 

And we have seen that   . So we found just a sequence of arguments   , which proves discontinuity of   at   .

Proof (Discontinuity of the topological sine function)

Let   with   for   and  . We consider the sequence   defined by  . For this sequence:

 

And there is:

 

Hence,   although   . This proves that   is discontinuous at   and therefore it is a discontinuous function.

Epsilon-Delta Criterion

Bearbeiten

Main article: Epsilon-delta definition of continuity

Review: Epsilon-Delta Criterion

Bearbeiten

Definition (Epsilon-Delta definition of discontinuity)

A function   with   is discontinuous at  , if and only if there is an   , such that for all   a   with   and   exists. Mathematically written,   is discontinuous at   iff

 

General proof structure

Bearbeiten

The Epsilon-Delta criterion of discontinuity can be formulated in predicate logic as follows:

 

From here we get a schematic that allows us the prove the discontinuity of a function using the delta-epsilon criterion:

 

Example exercise

Bearbeiten

Exercise (Discontinuity of the topological sine fucntion)

Prove the discontinuity at   for the topological sine function:

 

How to get to the proof? (Discontinuity of the topological sine fucntion)

In this exercise, discontinuity has to be shown for a given function. This is done by the negation of the epsilon-delta criterion. Our objective is to find both an   and an  , such that   and   . Here,   may be chosen depending on   , while   has to be the same for all   . For a solution, we may proceed as follows

Step 1: Simplify the target inequality

First, we may simplify the two inequalities which have to be fulfilled by plugging in   and  . We therefore get:   and  .

Step 2: Choose a suitable  

We consider the graph of the function   . It will help us finding the building bricks for our proof:

 
Graph of the topological sine function

We need to find an   , such that there are arguments in each arbitrarily narrow interval   whose function values have a distance larger than   from   . Visually, no matter how small the width   of the  - -rectangle is chosen, there will always be some points below or above it.

Taking a look at the graph, we see that our function oscillates between   and   . Hence,   may be useful. In that case, there will be function values with   in every arbitrarily small neighborhood around  . We choose  . This is visualized in the following figure:

 
The topological sine function oscillates between -1 and 1 nea the origin. Hence, in each neighborhood around 0, there will be arguments x , where f(x) has a distance larger than 1/2 to 0.

After   has been chosen, an arbitrary   will be assumed, for which we need to find a suitable  . This is what we will do next.

Step 3: Choice of a suitable  

We just set   . Therefore,   has to hold. So it would be nice to choose an   with   . Now,   is obtained for any   with   . The condition for   such that the function gets 1 is therefore:

 

So we found several   , where   . Now we only need to select one among them, which satisfies   for the given   . Our   depend on   . So we have to select a suitable   , where   . To do so, let us plug   into this inequality and solve it for   :

 

So the condition on   is  . If we choose just any natural number   above this threshold   , then   will be fulfilled. Such a   has to exist by Archimedes' axiom (for instance by flooring up the right-hand expression). So let us choose such a   and define   via   . This gives us both   and   . So we got all building bricks together, which we will now assemble to a final proof:

Proof (Discontinuity of the topological sine fucntion)

Choose   and let   be arbitrary. Choose a natural number   with  . Such a natural number   has to exist by Archimedes' axiom. Further, let  . Then:

 

In addition:

 

Hence, the function is discontinuous at  .

Exercises

Bearbeiten

Epsilon-delta criterion: Signum function

Bearbeiten

Exercise (Discontinuity of the signum function)

Prove that the signum function is   is discontinuous:

 

How to get to the proof? (Discontinuity of the signum function)

In order to prove discontinuity of the entire function, we just have to find one single argument where it is discontinuous. Considering the graph of   , we can already guess, which argument this may be:

 
Graph of the signum function

The function has a jump at   . So we expect it to be discontinuous, there. It remains to choose an   that makes it impossible to find a   , that makes the function fit into the  - -rectangle. This is done by setting   smaller than the jump height   - for instance  . For that  , no matter how   is given, there will be function values above or below the  - -rectangle.

So let   be arbitrary. We need to show that there is an   with   but   . Let us take a look at the inequality   :

 

This inequality classifies all   that can be used for the proof. The particular   we choose has to fulfill   :

 

So our   needs to fulfill both   and   . The second inequality   may be achieved quite easily: For any   , the value   is either   or  . So   does always fulfill  .

Now we need to fulfill the first inequality  . From the second inequality, we have just concluded   . This is particularly true for all   with   . Therefore, we choos   to be somewhere between   and   , for instance  .

The following figure shows that this is a sensible choice. The  - -rectangle with   and   is drawn here. All points above or below that rectangle are marked red. These are exactly all   inside the interval   excluding  . Our chosen   (red dot) is situated directly in the middle of the red part of the graph above the rectangle:

 
At x=δ/2, the graph is above the 2ϵ-2δ-rectangle

So choosing   is enough to complete the proof:

Proof (Discontinuity of the signum function)

We set   (this is where   is discontinuous). In addition, we choose  . Let   be arbitrary. For that given  , we choose  . Now, on one hand there is:

 

But on the other hand:

 

So indeed,   is discontinuous at   . Hence, the function   is discontinuous itself.