Derivative - inverse function – Serlo

In the following article we will investigate the conditions under which the inverse function of a bijective function is differentiable at one point. We will also derive a formula with which we can explicitly determine the derivative of the inverse function. The practical thing about this formula is that it allows us to determine the derivative at certain points, even if we do not know the inverse function explicitly or it is insanely difficult.

Motivation

Bearbeiten

Let us first consider a linear function as an example. For this it is very easy to determine the derivative of the inverse function. Non-constant linear functions are bijective and therefore invertible on  . In this case we can calculate the inverse function explicitly and differentiate it. Concretely we choose   with  . The inverse function is

 

  is differentiable on   and   for all  .

Let us next consider the function  . Here we have to be careful, because it is not injective on all of   and therefore not invertible. But if we restrict the domain of definition to  , then   is bijective. The inverse function is the square root function

 

For differentiability we have to consider another thing:   is not differentiable at  . We can show this by examining the differential quotient. Or we consider the following:

Since the root function   is the inverse function of the square function  , there is  . At zero there is thus in particular

 

If now   was differentiable at 0, then the chain rule would yield

 

So   cannot be differentiable at 0. However, on   , the function   is differentiable, and there is

 

This example shows that in case  , it may happen that   is not differentiable although   is differentiable everywhere.

In the two examples it was relatively easy to determine the derivative of the inverse function directly (it was a polynomial). But what about more complicated functions, for example   as an inverse function of  ? Here we cannot simply calculate the derivative of the inverse function, if only derivatives of exponentials and polynomials are known. It may even occur that a bijective function cannot be inverted explicitly. In these cases it would be good to have a general formula with which we can determine the derivative of   from the derivative of  . If we look again at the derivative from the second example, we may see the following:

 

Since there is   for all   and   for all  . In the first example (straight lines), there is also

 

Can this be chance? Actually, it's not: the formula is valid for a general. Consider   being differentiable at   and being differentiable   at   . By definition of the inverse function,

 

for all  . Now we take the derivative and obtain by the chain rule:

 

Here we have used that   in   and   in   are differentiable. Now we divide on both sides by   (note: this only possible if the expression is not equal to zero), and get

 

or equivalently

 

So the formula also holds in general under certain conditions. Now the question is, under which conditions at   the derivative of   exists.

  • On the one hand the   must exist. This is exactly the case if   is bijective, which is exactly the case if   is surjective and strictly monotonous.
  • As we have seen above,   must be differentiable in the point   with  .
  • We will see that we need one more condition, namely that   is continuous in  . If the domain of definition   of   is an interval, then this is always fulfilled according to the theorem about continuity of the inverse function.

These are the conditions necessary for our formula to hold. Let's put it into a theorem:

Theorem: derivative of the inverse function

Bearbeiten

Theorem and proof

Bearbeiten

Theorem (Derivative of the inverse function)

Let   and   be an interval. further, let   be a surjective and strictly monotonous function, which is differentiable in   where  . Then,   has an inverse function  , which is differentiable at   and there is:

 

Remarks:

  • The surjectivity of   is equivalent to  .
  • If   is differentiable on all of  , then according to the monotony criterion the strict monotony can be seen most easily by   or  .
  • As we have seen above with the derivative of the square root function   in  , the condition   must not be omitted under any circumstances. Otherwise, it produces "infinite derivatives", which are not well-defined!
  • The theorem also holds if   is not an interval. But then it must be demanded additionally that   in   is continuous. Furthermore,   and   must be accumulation points of   and   respectively.
  • If   is additionally continuous, then by continuity of the inverse function it follows that   is an interval.

Summary of proof (Derivative of the inverse function)

First of all we justify that   exists. Then we conclude by the theorem about the continuity of the inverse function that   is continuous. We show that the differential quotient   exists and has the value  . That is, that for every sequence   with   there is  .

Proof (Derivative of the inverse function)

  is surjective and strictly monotonous, i.e. bijective. So the inverse function   exists. Since we have assumed that   is an interval, the theorem about the continuity of the inverse function implies that   is continuous on  . There is thus   with  . Let now   be a sequence in   with  , then there is

 

Hence,   is differentiable in   and there is  .

Alternative proof (Derivative of the inverse function)

Another way of proof is given by an equivalent characterization of the derivative:   is differentiable in   if and only if there is a function   continuous at   with

 

If this is the case, then  . Since by assumption,   and   is strictly monotonous,   follows for all  . If we now set   and  , the above equation is

 

This is now equivalent to

 

Since   and   are continuous at   we also get continuity of   at  . If we now use again the equivalent characterization of continuity, it follows from the last equation that   is differentiable in   with

 

Memory rule and visualization

Bearbeiten
 
Graph of   with derivative  
 
Graph of   with derivative  

Using Leibniz's notation for the derivative, the formula of the derivative of the inverse function can be illustrated by a simple fraction-swap trick: For   and   there is

 

We can also visualize the formula graphically: If the function   is differentiable at   , then   corresponds to the slope of the tangent to the graph in  . Hence,

 

We now obtain the graph of the inverse function in two steps:

  1. First we have to rotate the graph of   by   (clockwise or counter-clockwise). The resulting graph has the slope   at the point  , because the tangent at this point is perpendicular to the original tangent.
  2. Then we have to mirror the graph (horizontally or vertically). The sign of the tangent gradient is reversed.

Altogether we get

 

Extension to the whole domain

Bearbeiten

The converse of the theorem also holds:

Theorem (Converse of the theorem about inverse function derivative)

Let   and   be an interval. Further, let   be a surjective, strictly monotonous function, which is differentiable at  . If further, the inverse function   is differentiable at  , then there is:   and

 

Proof (Converse of the theorem about inverse function derivative)

The proof works with the trick from the introduction. For all   we have

 

Under the above conditions, the left-hand side is differentiable at   (chain rule) with

 

Because 0 has no divisor (other than 0) in  , there must be   and we get

 

Let us now additionally demand in the original theorem that   is differentiable on all of   with  . Then we can determine the derivative function of   on all of  :

Theorem (Derivative of the inverse function)

Let   and   be an interval. Further, let   be a surjective, differentiable, strictly monotonous function with   for all  . Then   has a differentiable inverse function, whose derivative is given by:

 

Examples

Bearbeiten

Example (linear functions)

Let  ,   and

 

a linear function. Then   is surjective and strictly monotonously increasing, if  , and strictly monotonously decreasing, if  . Furthermore,   is differentiable on all of   with derivative  . According to the theorem about the derivative of the inverse function there is thus for all  

 

We could also have calculated this directly, as above.

Example (Root functions)

Let for  

 

Then   is differentiable and has the derivative  . So it is monotonously increasing. Furthermore,   is surjective. The inverse function is the  -th root function

 

For every   our theorem now yields

 .

If   is odd, then the formula holds even for all  .

Example (Logarithmic functions)

Let us look at the exponential function

 

We have learned that  . So the function is differentiable, and because of   strictly monotonously increasing. Furthermore,   is surjective. The inverse function is the (natural) logarithm function

 

Our theorem now implies for  :

 

Exercises

Bearbeiten

Exercise (Derivative of the inverse function)

Prove that die function

 

has a differentiable inverse function  . Determine the domain of definition of   and calculate  .

Solution (Derivative of the inverse function)

We have to check all conditions of the theorem about the derivative of the inverse function, one after the other.

Proof step:   is surjective

  is continuous on   as it is a composition of continuous functions. Further, there is

 

By the intermediate value theorem, for every   there is an   with  . So   is surjective.

Proof step:   is strictly monotonous

  is differentiable on   as it is a composition of continuous functions and

 

for all  . According to the monotony criterion,   is strictly monotonically decreasing, and therefore injective on  .

So   is bijective, and thus has a in inverse function  . The domain of definition   corresponds to the range of values of  .

Proof step:   is differentiable on   and   for all  

Differentiability was proven in step. As   there is also   for all  .

According to the theorem about the derivative of the inverse function, it is differentiable on all of  .

Proof step: Computation of von  

There is  . Hence  , and with the formula for the derivative of the inverse function there is

 

Exercise (Second derivative of the inverse function)

Let   with  , and   be a twice differentiable bijective function with  . Show that the inverse function   is twice differentiable, as well and express the second derivative of   at the position   by derivatives of   at a suitable position.

As application: Compute for the polynomial   the derivatives   and  .

Solution (Second derivative of the inverse function)

Proof step: First derivative of  

  is an interval and   is bijective. Because of   there is an   with  . Since   there is  . According to the theorem about the derivative of the inverse function  , is differentiable in   with

 

Proof step: Second derivative of  

  is twice differentiable. This means that   is differentiable. According to the quotient and chain rule   is therefore also differentiable at   and there is

 

Proof step: Computing the derivatives   and  

  is differentiable on   with  . So   is strictly monotonously increasing and therefore injective. Because   , according to the intermediate value theorem   is also surjective. So, ion total bijective. With   the derivative theorem of the inverse function implies


 

Further,   is twice differentiable with  . With the formula proven in step 2, there is hence