Continuity of the inverse function – Serlo

In this chapter we will introduce a theorem that gives a sufficient condition for the continuity of the inverse function of a bijective function. In mathematical literature this theorem is often referred to as the "Inverse function Theorem". What is astounding about this result is that the inverse function of a discontinuous function can actually be continuous.

Motivation Bearbeiten

 
The continuous and invertible function   with the domain  

First we want to consider the most general condition possible for when a bijective function   with   has a continuous inverse function. The first ansatz that we naturally wan to investigate is the continuity of   itself. We might spontaneously assume that the continuity of the inverse function   follows directly from the continuity of  . This is not necessarily the case, as is shown in the following example:

 
 
The discontinuous inverse function  

The function is continuous since it's continuous on both   and  . Furthermore it is strictly monotonously increasing, so it's injective. The image of   is   and therefore   is surjective. All together,   is bijective and therefore invertible. The inverse mapping   has functional values:

 

The inverse function is not continuous since it has a jump discontinuity at  . So it can definitely be the case that a continuous function has a discontinuous inverse.

But now another thing is apparent: the inverse function   is also invertible with the inverse function  . This means, however, that a discontinuous function (like  ) can have a continuous inverse function. Hence, we posit:

The (dis)continuity of an invertible function has in no capacity any influence on the (dis)continuity of its inverse function.

The problem lies in the domain of  . Namely, this is  , i.e. not an interval. The domain is not connected and has a "gap." How does this "gap" affect the inverse function  ?

Since the domain of   corresponds to what should be the codomain of  , the inverse function also has this "gap" in its codomain. Similarly, the codomain of   corresponds to the domain of  . It is for this reason that   can not be continuous. The domain of   is an interval and therefore connected, while its codomain contains a gap. Since   is surjective and must attain every value in what should be its codomain, the graph of   must lend itself to a jump point somewhere. This is why   is not continuous.

Thus, we must require that, by assumption, the domain of   is an interval to ensure that we don't encounter any problems. Usually this requirement is sufficient to guarantee the continuity of  . We can prove this using the  -  characterization of continuity. With the help of Zwischenwertsatzes we can futhermore conclude that the codomain of   - and therefore the domain of   - is an interval.

Theorem on the Continuity of the Inverse Function Bearbeiten

Theorem (Continuity of the Inverse Function)

Let   be an interval and   a surjective, strictly monotone, and continuous mapping. Then   is bijective, and the inverse function

 

is continuous and in the same sense as   strictly monotone. Furthermore,   is an interval.

Proof (Continuity of the Inverse Function)

Proof step:   is bijective

Let   with  . Then it either mus be the case   or  . Since   is strictly monotone, it follows   or  . In either case it holds  . So therefore   is injective. Since   is surjective by assumption, the mapping is bijective.

Proof step:   is strictly monotone

Without loss of generality let   be strictly monotone increasing, i.e.   follows from   with  . Now let   with  . Now we ust show that  .

There exist some   with   and  . Therefore,   and  . Since   is injective, it holds  . It also can not be the case that   holds. Otherwise it must then hold  , which can not be the case because  .

Thus,   and  . This proves that   is strictly monotone increasing like  . Proving that   is striclty monotone decreasing when we assume   is strictly monotone decreasing is analogous.

Proof step:   is continuous

We will use the  - -characterization of continuity. To that end, let   and let   be arbitrary. Further, let   be the preimage of   under  , i.e.  . Now we have to show that there exists some   such that   holds for all   with  . Then we will have achieved showing   is continuous in  . Since   can be chosen arbitrarily, from there we can conclude the continuity of the mapping  . We must, however, differentiate between the two cases of whether or not   is a boundary point of  :

Fall 1:   is not a boundary point of  

Since   is not a boundary point of  , there exists some   with   and  . We set   and  . If   is strictly monotone increasing, then it holds  . If   is strictly monotone decreasing, then it holds  . Thus,   maps the interval   bijectively to   and  . If we set

 

then it follows

 

Hence, the condition   for all   with   is fulfilled and   is continuous in  .

Fall 2:   is a boundary point of  

We may assume without loss of generality that   is the maximum of  . Now there exists some   with   such that   lies in  . Therefore the value   exists and we can set  .

If   is strictly monotone increasing, then   maps the interval   bijectively to  . Then it holds  . Because no   exists with  , it must therefore hold   for all   with  . This proves the continuity of   in  . The proof for the case where   is monotone decreasing is analogous.

Examples Bearbeiten

Root Functions Bearbeiten

Example (Root Functions)

If   with  , then the  -th power function is defined as

 

This is a strictly monotonously increasing function, since for   with   it holds

 

Furthermore, this means   is injective. The function   is also surjective, since for every   it holds for  :

 

The inverse function is the  -th root function   with  .By the Inverse Function Theorem, this function is continuous and also strictly monotone increasing.

Natural Logarithm Functions Bearbeiten

Example (Natural Logarithm Functions)

The exponential function

 

is strictly monotone increasing. Let   with  . Then there exists some   with  . It therefore holds

 

From the strict monotonicity it follows that   is injective. Furthermore, the exponential function is surjective since:

 

The surjectivity follows from the continuity of the exponential function and the Intermediate Value Theorem. The inverse function of the exponential function is the so-called natural logarithm function:

 

This function is also strictly monotone increasing (which is a result of the strict monotonicity of the exponential function). Furthermore, we can apply the Inverse Function Theorem and conclude that the logarithm function is also continuous.

Exercises Bearbeiten

Exercise 1 Bearbeiten

Exercise (Continuity of the Inverse Function)

Let   be defined by the following values:

 

Prove the following claims:

  1. Show that   is continuous, strictly monotone increasing, and injective on  .
  2. Show that   is surjective.
  3. Give a justification for why the inverse function   exists and determine the explicit functional values for  . Show that   is continuous and strictly monotone increasing.

Solution (Continuity of the Inverse Function)

Solution sub-exercise 1:

  is continuous since it is the quotient of continuous functions   and  .   thereby holds for all  . Let   with  . To prove the strict monotonicity we will show  :

Fall 1:  

Then it holds

 

Fall 2:  

Here it holds

 

Fall 3:  

Here it holds

 

Fall 4:  

It holds

 

So then   is strictly monotone increasing on   and therefore also injective.

Solution sub-exercise 2:

It holds for all  :

 

It follows immediately that   holds. Furthermore,

 

and

 

Since   is continuous, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, for every   there exists an   with  . So it holds for the image that  , whereby   is surjective.

Solution sub-exercise 3:

Since   is bijective, the inverse function   exists. As an inverse function,   is also bijective. By the Theorem of Continuity of the Inverse Function,   is furthermore continuous and strictly monotone increasing. In order to calculate   we must first differentiate between two cases:

Fall 1:  

 

Fall 2:  

 

If we now have  , then   and therefore  . On the other hand, if  , then so is   and therefore  . All together, we can conclude

 

Exercise 2 Bearbeiten

Exercise (Continuity of the Inverse Function 2)

Let   with  

  1. Show that   is injective.
  2. Determine the image  .
  3. Justify why the inverse function   is continuous.

Solution (Continuity of the Inverse Function 2)

Solution sub-exercise 1:

  is continuous as it is the composition of the continuous functions  ,   and  . Furthermore, for   with   it holds:

 

Now it holds   for  . Since the sine function is strictly monotone increasing on the half-interval  , it follows

 

Because the exponential function is strictly monotone increasing, it furthermore holds that  . Then we have:

 

So   is strictly monotone increasing and therefore injective.

Solution sub-exercise 2:

= First, we observe

 

Furthermore,

 

and from there it follows that

 

Since   is continuous and   is an interval,   is also an interval (see „Folgerung zum Zwischenwertsatz“). Since   is strictly monotone increasing and  , it follows

 

Solution sub-exercise 3:

Since   is an interval and   is bijective, the inverse function   is continuous by the Continuous Inverse Function Theorem.