Exercises: Derivatives 2 – Serlo


Derivative of the inverse function Bearbeiten

Exercise (Derivative of the inverse function)

Consider the function

 

Justify that the following derivatives and limits exist and calculate them:

  1.   and  
  2.   and  

Solution (Derivative of the inverse function)

Part 1:

Proof step: Existence and computation of  

  is differentiable on   as a sum of the differentiable functions   and   with derivative

 

So  .

Proof step: Existence and computation of  

  is differentiable on   as a sum of the differentiable functions   and   with derivative

 

Further,  , since   for  . So   is strictly monotonously increasing by the monotony criterion and hence injective. Further,   is bijective. And we have  , so  , and there is  . Hence   is differentiable at   with

 

Part 2:

Proof step: Computation of  

There is

 

So

 

Proof step: Computation of  

There is  . According to the intermediate value theorem,   is bijective. For all   we thus have

 

So

 

Derivative of a general logarithm function Bearbeiten

Exercise (Derivative of a general logarithm function)

Show that the function

 

with base   is bijective and differentiable on   . Show further that the inverse function

 

is differentiable on all of   with derivative  .

Solution (Derivative of a general logarithm function)

Proof step:   is bijective and differentiable

Fall 1:  

  is continuous on   as a composition of continuous functions. Further , since  ,   and   there is:

 

as well as

 

By the intermediate value theorem,   and   is therefore surjective. Moreover,   is differentiable according to the chain rule as a composition of differentiable functions, and

 

for all  . By the monotonicity criterion,   is strictly monotonously increasing, and hence injective. So we have shown the bijectivity of  .

Fall 2:  

  is continuous on   as a composition of continuous functions. Further , since  ,   and   there is:

 

as well as

 

By the intermediate value theorem,   and   is therefore surjective. Moreover,   is differentiable according to the chain rule as a composition of differentiable functions, and

 

for all  . By the monotonicity criterion,   is strictly monotonously decreasing, and hence injective. So we have shown the bijectivity of  .

Proof step:   exists and is differentiable

  is bijective on   and hence invertible. Further, there is

 

So

 

Since in addition   for all  , the theorem about inverse function derivatives yields that   is differentiable on   with

 

Exercise (derivatives on   and area-functions)

Show that the functions

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

are differentiable, and determine their derivative.

Proof (derivatives on   and area-functions)

Differentiability of  :

For the cotangent function   there is: . Thus the function is differentiable and strictly monotonically decreasing, and thus injective. Further,  . Thus   is bijective. The inverse function

 

is differentiable according to the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function, and for   there is:

 

Differentiability of  :

The hyperbolic sine function   is differentiable with  . Thus it is strictly monotonously increasing, and hence injective. Further,  . So it is also surjective. The inverse function

 

is differentiable by the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function , and for   there is:

 

Differentiability of  :

The hyperbolic cosine function   is differentiable with   on  . Thus it is strictly monotonically increasing, and hence injective. Further,  . So it is also surjective. The inverse function

 

is differentiable by to the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function, and for   there is:

 

Differentiability of  :

For the cotangent function   there is:  . Thus the function is strictly monotonically increasing, and thus injective. Further,  . Thus   is bijective. The inverse function

 

is differentiable by the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function, and for   there is:

 

Exercise (Non-differentiable functions at zero)

Let  . Show that:

  1. Let   with   and   for all  . Then   and   are not simultaneously differentiable at zero.
  2. Let  , and let   be differentiable at zero. Further let   and   for all  . Then   is not differentiable at zero.

Solution (Non-differentiable functions at zero)

Part 1: Assuming   and   are differentiable at zero. Then according to the product rule,   is also differentiable at zero, and from   we get for all   that:

  ?

So   and   cannot both be differentiable at zero.

Part 2: Assume that   is differentiable at zero. Then according to the chain rule   is also differentiable at zero, and from   we get for all   that:

  ?

So   cannot be differentiable at zero.

Derivatives of higher order Bearbeiten

Exercise 1 Bearbeiten

Exercise (Arbitrarily often differentiable function)

Show that the function   is arbitrarily often differentiable and for all   there is:

 

Proof (Arbitrarily often differentiable function)

The proof goes by induction over  :

Theorem whose validity shall be proven for the  :

 

1. Base case:

 

1. inductive step:

2a. inductive hypothesis:

 

2b. induction theorem:

 

2b. proof of induction step:

 

Exercise 2 Bearbeiten

Exercise (Exactly one/two/three times differentiable functions)

Provide an example of a

  1. function  
  2. function that is differentiable, but not continuously differentiable on  
  3. function  

Solution (Exactly one/two/three times differentiable functions)

Solution sub-exercise 1:

  or   or  

Solution sub-exercise 2:

  or  

Solution sub-exercise 3:

  or   or  

Solution sub-exercise 4:

  or   or  

Hint

We can successively proceed with the construction of functions and obtain some   for all  , with

  or   or  

Exercise 3 Bearbeiten

Exercise (Application of the Leibniz rule)

Determine the following derivatives using the Leibniz rule

  1.  
  2.   for  

Solution (Application of the Leibniz rule)

Solution sub-exercise 1:

The functions   and   are arbitrarily often differentiable on   . Hence there is

 

Solution sub-exercise 2:

The functions   and   are arbitrarily often differentiable on   . Hence there is