Exercises: Derivatives 2 – Serlo
Derivative of the inverse function
BearbeitenExercise (Derivative of the inverse function)
Consider the function
Justify that the following derivatives and limits exist and calculate them:
- and
- and
Solution (Derivative of the inverse function)
Part 1:
Proof step: Existence and computation of
is differentiable on as a sum of the differentiable functions and with derivative
So .
Proof step: Existence and computation of
is differentiable on as a sum of the differentiable functions and with derivative
Further, , since for . So is strictly monotonously increasing by the monotony criterion and hence injective. Further, is bijective. And we have , so , and there is . Hence is differentiable at with
Part 2:
Proof step: Computation of
There is
So
Proof step: Computation of
There is . According to the intermediate value theorem, is bijective. For all we thus have
So
Derivative of a general logarithm function
BearbeitenExercise (Derivative of a general logarithm function)
Show that the function
with base is bijective and differentiable on . Show further that the inverse function
is differentiable on all of with derivative .
Solution (Derivative of a general logarithm function)
Proof step: is bijective and differentiable
Fall 1:
is continuous on as a composition of continuous functions. Further , since , and there is:
as well as
By the intermediate value theorem, and is therefore surjective. Moreover, is differentiable according to the chain rule as a composition of differentiable functions, and
for all . By the monotonicity criterion, is strictly monotonously increasing, and hence injective. So we have shown the bijectivity of .
Fall 2:
is continuous on as a composition of continuous functions. Further , since , and there is:
as well as
By the intermediate value theorem, and is therefore surjective. Moreover, is differentiable according to the chain rule as a composition of differentiable functions, and
for all . By the monotonicity criterion, is strictly monotonously decreasing, and hence injective. So we have shown the bijectivity of .
Proof step: exists and is differentiable
is bijective on and hence invertible. Further, there is
So
Since in addition for all , the theorem about inverse function derivatives yields that is differentiable on with
Exercise (derivatives on and area-functions)
Show that the functions
are differentiable, and determine their derivative.
Proof (derivatives on and area-functions)
Differentiability of :
For the cotangent function there is: . Thus the function is differentiable and strictly monotonically decreasing, and thus injective. Further, . Thus is bijective. The inverse function
is differentiable according to the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function, and for there is:
Differentiability of :
The hyperbolic sine function is differentiable with . Thus it is strictly monotonously increasing, and hence injective. Further, . So it is also surjective. The inverse function
is differentiable by the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function , and for there is:
Differentiability of :
The hyperbolic cosine function is differentiable with on . Thus it is strictly monotonically increasing, and hence injective. Further, . So it is also surjective. The inverse function
is differentiable by to the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function, and for there is:
Differentiability of :
For the cotangent function there is: . Thus the function is strictly monotonically increasing, and thus injective. Further, . Thus is bijective. The inverse function
is differentiable by the theorem on the derivative of the inverse function, and for there is:
Exercise (Non-differentiable functions at zero)
Let . Show that:
- Let with and for all . Then and are not simultaneously differentiable at zero.
- Let , and let be differentiable at zero. Further let and for all . Then is not differentiable at zero.
Solution (Non-differentiable functions at zero)
Part 1: Assuming and are differentiable at zero. Then according to the product rule, is also differentiable at zero, and from we get for all that:
So and cannot both be differentiable at zero.
Part 2: Assume that is differentiable at zero. Then according to the chain rule is also differentiable at zero, and from we get for all that:
So cannot be differentiable at zero.
Derivatives of higher order
BearbeitenExercise 1
BearbeitenExercise (Arbitrarily often differentiable function)
Show that the function is arbitrarily often differentiable and for all there is:
Proof (Arbitrarily often differentiable function)
The proof goes by induction over :
Theorem whose validity shall be proven for the :
1. Base case:
1. inductive step:
2a. inductive hypothesis:
2b. induction theorem:
2b. proof of induction step:
Exercise 2
BearbeitenExercise (Exactly one/two/three times differentiable functions)
Provide an example of a
- function
- function that is differentiable, but not continuously differentiable on
- function
Solution (Exactly one/two/three times differentiable functions)
Solution sub-exercise 1:
Solution sub-exercise 2:
Solution sub-exercise 3:
Solution sub-exercise 4:
Hint
We can successively proceed with the construction of functions and obtain some for all , with
Exercise 3
BearbeitenExercise (Application of the Leibniz rule)
Determine the following derivatives using the Leibniz rule
- for
Solution (Application of the Leibniz rule)
Solution sub-exercise 1:
The functions and are arbitrarily often differentiable on . Hence there is
Solution sub-exercise 2:
The functions and are arbitrarily often differentiable on . Hence there is