Exercises: Derivatives 4 – Serlo

Criterion for constancy Bearbeiten

Exercise (Simple application)

Let   and  . For the function   we assume

 

for all  . Show that then,   is constant.

Solution (Simple application)

By assumption there is

 

Further there is  , since  . The squeeze theorem then yields

 

for all  . By the computation rule for limits we then get a zero differential quotient

 

for all  . Hence   is constant.

Exercise (Proof of identities)

Show that

  1.  
  2.   for all  

Proof (Proof of identities)

Part 1: The function

 

is differentiable by the chain- and difference rule with

 

So   is constant. Since further there is

 

we have  .

Part 2:

 

is differentiable according to the sum rule, since the arcus-functions are differentiable. Further there is

 

Hence   is constant. Further there is

 

since   and  . So   establishing the assertion.

Exercise (Logarithm representations of   and  )

Show that

  1.   for  
  2.   for  

Proof (Logarithm representations of   and  )

Part 1:

The function   is differentiable, see examples for derivatives, with

 

By the chain- and sum rule also   is differentiable with

 

So we get  . But now,

 

since  , and there is

 

So  , and hence  .

Part 2:

  is differentiable, as well, with

 

By the factor-, chain- and quotient rule, also   is differentiable with

 

So we have  . Since

 

by  , as well as

 

there is again  , and hence  .

Exercise (Extension of the identity theorem)

Let   be twice differentiable with  . Then   and   differ only by a linear function   with  .

Solution (Extension of the identity theorem)

Because   according to the identity theorem there is a   with

 

if we now set  , then there is

 

the identity theorem again provides us with a   such that

 

Exercise (General solution of a differential equation)

Let   be differentiable and  . Further let

 

Show that:

  1.   and   satisfy the differential equations.
  2. If two functions   and   satisfy the differential equations, then there is   and  .
  3. Furthermore, if   and there is   and  , then   and  .

Proof (General solution of a differential equation)

Part 1: There is

 

and

 

So   and   satisfy the differential equations.

Part 2:We define (as given in the hint) the auxiliary functions

 

These are differentiable by the product-, sum- and difference rule with

 

and

 

by the criterion for constancy, there is now

 

with  . Further there is

 

So   and  .

Part 3: If further   and

 

then

 

Hint

Since   and analogously   both the functions   and   satisfy the differential equation   (or  ).

Monotony criterion Bearbeiten

Exercise (Monotony of the exponential function)

Show using the monotony criterion that:

  1. For all   there is  
  2.   is strictly monotonously increasing.

Hint: use 1. in order to prove 2.

Solution (Monotony of the exponential function)

Part 1: For the differentiable auxiliary function   there is

 

So   is strictly monotonously decreasing by the monotony criterion. Further

 
Graph of the function  
 

and

 

Since   is continuous and strictly monotonously decreasing, there must be  .

Part 2:

There is  . Since   is strictly monotonously increasing, the function   is strictly monotonously increasing, if and only if the "inner function"   is. This function in turn is differentiable on all of   by the product rule and there is

 

By the monotony criterion, the function  , and hence also   is strictly monotonously increasing.

Exercise (Condition for monotonicity of a cubic function)

Let  . Provide a condition for   such that

 

is strictly monotonously increasing on all of  .

Hint: Distinguish the cases  ,   and  

Solution (Condition for monotonicity of a cubic function)

For   being strictly monotonously increasing on all of  , we need by the monotony criterion that

 

holds for all  .

Fall 1:  

Then  . For   to be strictly monotonously increasing,   must hold. For   this is never possible for any  .


However, if  , then there is  . So   is strictly monotonously increasing for   and  .

Fall 2:  

By completing the square, we get

 

So   is strictly monotonously increasing whenever there is

 

This is satisfied for all   if and only if the right-hand side   is negative. This in turn is exactly the case for

 

Hence,   is strictly monotonously increasing for   and   .

Fall 3:  

Here, we have

 

However, this is never fulfilled for all  . So in this case   is never strictly monotonous increasing.

Hint

Similarly, we can show that   is strictly monotonously decreasing in the cases   and  , as well as for   and  .

Exercise (Applying the monotony criterion)

Let   be differentiable with  . Further let   for some (fixed)   and all  . Show that there is

  for all  

Hint: Consider the auxiliary function  .

Proof (Applying the monotony criterion)

As stated in the hint we consider

 

  is differentiable according to the product rule with

 

But now   and by assumption  . So there is

  for all  

by the monotony criterion,   is monotonously decreasing. Since further there is   we have

  for all  

Therefore, we also have

  for all  

Derivative and extrema Bearbeiten

Exercise (Extrema of functions 1)

Investigate whether the following functions have local/global extrema. Determine and characterise these if they exist.

  1.  
  2.  

Solution (Extrema of functions 1)

Part 1:

Part 1: Local extrema of  

  is differentiable on   according to the quotient rule with

 

According to the sufficient criterion for the existence of an extremum  , there must be  . Now

 

So   and   are the candidates for local extrema in  . Now there is

 

The case   and   is not possible. Thus   holds on  .

Further there is

 

So   holds on   and on  .

By the sufficient criterion,   is a (strict) local minimum and   is a (strict) local maximum of  .

Part 2: Global extrema of  

For global extrema we first have to determine the limits   and  .

Since   and   there is

 
Graph of the function  
 

Thus   is unbounded from above, and therefore has no local extremum. Further, for   every power of   grows slower than  . Thus

 

(As numerator and denominator are positive.) Now  . Thus   is a global minimum of  .

Part 2:

Part 1: Local extrema of  

  is differentiable on   by the chain rule with

 
Graph of the function  
 

Since now   and   there is,  . By the necessary criterion for extrema,   has no local extrema on  .

Since   is continuous on  , it follows from   for all   that   is strictly monotonously decreasing on  . Therefore   has a local maximum at  .

Part 2: Global extrema of  

Using the same argument as in part 1, it follows that   is even a global maximum of  .

Exercise (Extrema of functions 2)

Investigate whether the following functions are continuous, differentiability and/or have local/global extrema:

 

Solution (Extrema of functions 2)

Part 1: continuity and differentiability

Continuity:

On   the function   is continuous as a polynomial. The function   is continuous on   as a composition of the continuous functions  ,   and  . At   there is

 

In addition, since   and by continuity of the exponential function

 

So   is continuous at zero and hence on all of   .

Differentiability:

On   the function   is differentiable as a polynomial, with

 

On   the function   is differentiable by the chain- and product rule as it is a composition of differentiable functions  ,   and  . There is

 

At   there is, according to L'Hospital's rule,

 

So   is not differentiable at zero.

Part 2: Local and global extrema

Local extrema:

On   there is  . So   cannot have local extrema there.

On   however

 

So   is a candidate for a possible extremum. Further

 

So   has a strict local minimum in  .

Now we still have to examine  . Since   is not differentiable there, our necessary and sufficient criteria are not applicable. However, there is

  for all  

and

  for all  

Thus   is strictly monotonously increasing on  , and strictly monotonously decreasing on  . Since   is continuous at zero, it follows that

  for all  

So   has a strict local maximum in   .

Global extrema:

There is

 
Graph of the function  
 

and

 

Therefore   is unbounded from above and below, and has no global extrema.

Exercise (Extrema of functions 3)

Show that the function

 

has exactly two local extrema, and determine their type.

Solution (Extrema of functions 3)

Candidates for the extreme values are obtained from our necessary condition

 
 
Graph of the auxiliary function  

Since the zeros of   cannot be calculated explicitly, we need to examine this function more closely. There is

  1.  
  2.  ,   and  

Because of continuity and 2.   with the intermediate value theorem has (at least) two zeros   and  .

Because of 1., the function   is strictly monotonously increasing on   and strictly monotonously decreasing on  . Thus   is respectively injective on   and   and thus has exactly the two zeros   and  .

For the derivative of   we now have

 

According to our first sufficient criterion,   has a strict local maximum at   and a strict local minimum at  .

Computing limits via L'Hospital Bearbeiten

Exercise (L'Hospital 1)

Compute the following limits

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  
  5.   with  
  6.  
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  

Solution (L'Hospital 1)

Part 1:

 

Part 2:

L'Hospital's rule is not applicable here. However, the function   is continuous at the point  , and therefore there is

 

Part 3:

 

Part 4:

This limit value does not exist. First it can be decomposed into

 

For the left-hand limit there is now with Part 1:

 

Analogously, however, for the right-hand limit:

 

So  , and hence   does not exist.

Part 5:

 

Part 6:

L'Hospital can be applied here, but it is useless:

 

Instead, it makes sense to use the definitions of   and  , and then transform the quotient:

 

Part 7:

L'Hospital cannot be applied here because the enumerator   for   diverges (improperly). Instead, the fraction can be estimated as follows:

 

Using the squeeze theorem, it follows  .

Part 8:

 

Part 9:

 

Part 10:

 

Exercise (L'Hospital 2)

Compute the following limits:

  1.  
  2.  
  3.   for  
  4.  
  5.  
  6.  
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.   for  

Solution (L'Hospital 2)

Part 1:
 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

Part 2:
 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

Part 3:
 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

Part 4:
 
Part 5:
 

For the expression in the exponent there is now

 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

By continuity of   at   we now get

 

Part 6: First we have: If the limit   exists, then the sequence limit   also exists.

Further:

 

For the expression in the exponent there is now

 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

By continuity of   at   we now get

 

And now, we also have  .

Part 7:
 

For the expression in the exponent there is now

 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

By continuity of   at   we now get

 
Part 8:
 

For the expression in the exponent there is now

 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

By continuity of   at   we now get

 
Part 9:
 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

Part 10:
 

and since the limit exists, the application of L'Hospital is justified.

Exercise (Differentiability at a point)

Let

 
  1. Show that   is continuous at zero.
  2. Show that   is differentiable on   and compute the derivative.
  3. Determine by 1. and 2. the derivative  .

Solution (Differentiability at a point)

Part 1: By L'Hospital there is

 

So   is continuous at zero.

Part 2: Since  ,   and   are differentiable on   , the quotient rule yields that   is differentiable. Further there is for  :

 

Part 3: We use the criterion from the theorem above. There is

 

Using the criterion,   is differentiable at zero with  .